Posts Tagged ‘ movie

Media Madness: Worst Performances Ever! (or Until Mandrake Comes Out)

In Media Madness, Matt. Murray reviews, revisits and rambles about comics, cartoons and their interactions in and with related media.

I read some disappointing news over at Dark Horizons last week — rumor has it that Hayden Christensen will be playing Mandrake the Magician in some Criss Angel style adaptation of the Lee Falk comic strip of the same name.  Ugh.

manhayd

While I’m not adverse to updating and playing with what is clearly a dated concept and character, I am frightened and saddened by choosing uber-douche Angel as the mold to recast the hero in (he evidently has a cameo as well) and then there’s casting Dork Vader himself to carry the production… In the words of Patton Oswalt doing his impression of Nick Nolte as Han Solo: Aw Hell, Chewbacca!

How the hell does this guy still get work? Has no one been to the movies in the past ten years? This kid buckled under the weight of the second Star Wars trilogy and was outperformed by the special effects and Billy Fu@%ing Elliot in Jumper. He can barely sustain the illusion of having an emotion on screen, how are we supposed to buy into the fact that he’s the world’s greatest illusionist and escape artist?

(In better news, Djimon “Give Us Us Free” Hounsou is in it too.  I’m assuming he’s playing Mandrake’s African sidekick Lothar as he’s absolutely perfect casting in that department.   So here’s hoping that maybe the producers and director aren’t complete shortbussers.)

djilothar

In honor of this disgusting piece of casting that will no doubt amount to a staggering disappointment, and the death of another potentially cool classic comic franchise (The Phantom and/or Spirit, anyone?), I’ve assembled a list of the 5 worst performances in movies adapted from comics in the past 10 years or so.

Disclaimer: Enjoy the list, but by no means don’t watch the films. Really. You shouldn’t. Not only are they horrible performances but these people will get paid in some way, shape or form if you pick up the disc or watch it via some other legal means. Don’t encourage crap kids, it only begets more!

Read more

Media Madness: No Sir, Didn’t Like ‘Em

Every Monday, Matt. Murray reviews, revisits and rambles about comics, cartoons and their interactions in and with related media.

by Matt. Murray

A little more than ten years ago, the mis-identified “genre” of comic book movies entered a new phase with the release of the first Blade.  Declared dead in 1997, thanks largely to the efforts of Joel Schumacher and Akiva Goldsman, movies based on superhero comics bounced back a summer later thanks to the underestimated efforts of and a lot of luck riding on the side of  screenwriter David Goyer, actor Wesley Snipes and director  Stephen NorringtonBlade opened the door for not only two sequels, but for the development and final greenlighting of several other Marvel Comics properties including X-Men and Spider-Man.

Now, as we have either just left or recently entered a newer cycle thanks to Iron Man and The Dark Knight, and the just released Watchmen looms in the collective consciousness – splitting the ranks of film and comics fans a like, I feel that its a good time to take a look back at what I believe to be the true crap that emerged from the shadows of Blade.

This isn’t a list of “the worst” super hero movies per se, but rather a brief look at films I really didn’t like from the past ten years and why I didn’t care for them.

Read more

Media Madness: The Watchmaker (Redux)

Media Madness features reviews and rambles about comics, cartoons and their interactions in and with related media.

by Matt. Murray

It’s some point after Monday, March 9th, 2009.  12:00 PM. You are reading this post.

It’s Wednesday, February 25th, 2009.  2:29PM. I have just purchased my ticket for Watchmen: The IMAX Experience via Fandango. Most of the weekend’s screenings have already sold out and the first available show is on Sunday March 8th, 2009 at 2:00 PM.

imax-tik

It’s Wednesday, March 4th, 2009.  12:00PM. I am walking out of Best Buy, having just bought a copy of Warner Premiere’s Watchmen: The Complete Motion Comic.

It’s Monday, February 23rd, 2009. Wired publishes an interview with Watchmen writer Alan Moore in which he states:

If a thing works well in one medium, in the medium that it has been designed to work in, then the only possible point for wanting to realize it on “multiple platforms,” as they say these days, is to make a lot of money out of it. There is no consideration for the integrity of the work, which is rather the only thing as far as I’m concerned.

It’s Friday, March 6th, 2009.  4:00PM. I have just started to write this post.

Read more

Mind in the Gutter: Ooh, ooh, I know! Watching the Watchmen!!!

On alternating Fridays, Leah Schnelbach waxes rhapsodic about comics, education, religion, film and postmodernity.

This week, a very interesting issue of The New Yorker hit the stands. It’s interesting first and foremost because of the excellent and heart-wrenching article on David Foster Wallace (my favorite writer) along with an excerpt from his last novel, which is being published posthumously. They also have one of the most frustrating movie reviews I’ve ever seen. The reason that I’m mentioning it on this site is that it’s a review of Watchmen.  Full disclosure – I haven’t seen Watchmen yet. [Ed.: Watchmen is released nationally today.] I’ll probably see it at some point next week, after the first throngs have strained and shuddered and spent themselves. So I’m not reviewing the review of the film, or disagreeing with it. Why bring it up, then, you may ask?  On reading this review, looking only for the writer’s opinion of the film, I found myself disturbed and eventually angered by the tone of distaste it shows, not for the film, but rather for comics culture as a whole.  Now, if the review simply expressed an opinion that the film wasn’t very good that would be fine  (Although, for the record, he seems to prefer The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen as a film to the adaptation of V for Vendetta, and while neither was great, there is a fucking yawning chasm between the two….)

My real problem is that the film, as a film, isn’t really reviewed.  The author discusses enjoying the opening credits, but from there contents himself in swipes at Alan Moore as a writer (even though he states early on that Moore had nothing to do with the film), itemizes the acts of violence in the film (as though containing scenes of violence disqualifies a film from also being interesting or at least dealing with interesting topics), and finally resorts to a creaky kids-these-days style rant against comics readers. At least, those comics readers who don’t mind if characters throw a cape over their shoulders now and then.

Read more

Monday Media Madness: Happy Biznittles, You Birthday Garrump

Every Monday, Matt. Murray reviews, revisits and rambles about comics, cartoons and their interactions in and with related media.

by Matt. Murray

seussjacket

Original art by Matt. Murray

On this Second of March, one should take the time,
To thank a giant…A TITAN of rhyme!

Read more

 
Better Tag Cloud